Derive the unique_id from the sensor name #56
Conversation
This leads to more "stable" unique_ids, not losing the history data after changing the friendly_name property in the configuration.
|
@Bouni this is surely a kind-of "breaking change" and will reset all existing history data for all luxtronik entities.. |
|
@remuslazar @BenPru I think from now on we should only work on a dev branch. No more changes to main until the merge (on is done. Once that is the case we can also apply the PR's and release a shiny new version that maybe breaking again but that hopefully for the last time (at least in a while). @remuslazar please rebase this to the dev branch |
|
@Bouni sorry for the long delay here.. I have somehow missed your request. Anyway, the code was already on top of the dev branch so I have just changed the base for this PR. btw: it will be nice to have a current release of luxtronik, this package being currently pinned to 0.3.14 which does not support new entities, e.g. Thanks! |
|
Hey @Bouni, Just wanted to check in and see if there's been any progress here. I am using my fork for quite a while now but I will like to integrate this integration via HACS. Let me know if I can help out with anything! Cheers, |
|
Unfortunately, no 🫤 |
|
@Bouni can I jump in and help you out here? |
This leads to more "stable" unique_ids, not losing the history data after changing the friendly_name property in
the configuration.